PedigreeAbihu
M, #12526, b. 1525 BCE, d. 26 May 1490 BCE
Parents
Events
Note
Nadab and Abihu were the first two sons of Aaron the Levite by his marriage to Elisheba. He had four sons in total, the younger two sons being named Eleazar and Ithamar. According to the book of Exodus, Aaron and his sons were the first priests appointed as the priestly system was established by God.[2] The Levites as a tribe were later ordained for the priestly service after answering a call to take the LORD’s side after the idolatry centered around the golden calf.[3] After the death of Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar took their places as priests, because neither Nadab nor Abihu had any sons.[4]
[edit] Violation of God’s law and punishmentIn Leviticus 9 and Exodus 30, God outlines a proper sacrifice to him.[5] Aaron, the chief priest, was to present all offerings representing himself and the people.
Moses said to Aaron, “Come to the altar and sacrifice your sin offering and your burnt offering and make atonement for yourself and the people; sacrifice the offering that is for the people and make atonement for them, as the LORD has commanded.”
— Leviticus 9:7 New International Version
God would send his own fire to consume the sacrifice as a sign of his presence.[6]
When Nadab and Abihu lit the offering in the censers themselves, the fire was unauthorized and God was not in it.[7] They prepared an incense offering upon kindling of their own. No offering of incense had been ordered; the only legitimate incense offerings were those made daily by the high priest upon the sacred altar.[8] Aaron’s sons neglected the command to wait for holy fire and offered incense with unauthorized fire.[9] Anyone who altered the sacrificial system assumed a prerogative belonging to God alone.[10] God determines the judgments that are carried out against those who either add to or take away from the declarations of God.[11]
[edit] Burial and mourning[edit] BurialAfter the death of Nadab and Abihu, Moses dictated what was to be done with their bodies. He told Mishael and Elzaphan, the sons of Aaron’s uncle, to carry the bodies away from the sanctuary to a place outside of the camp. He specified for Mishael and Elzaphan to be careful to only touch Nadab and Abihu’s tunics, and not their bodies.[12] The first concerns in burial were to prevent what is holy from being defiled and the service of God from being disrupted.[13] The corpses had to be removed immediately, because to allow the uncleanliness of the bodies to remain in the sanctuary could invoke God’s wrath again.[14] The bodies were lifted up “by their tunics”[15] to avoid direct physical contact, preventing the carriers from becoming unclean as well.[16]
[edit] MourningAaron and the other surviving priests are commanded not to mourn, participate in mourning rituals, or have contact with the dead. This was applicable not only in this case, but it was an ongoing command; these things are were generally forbidden to priests.[17] Priests were to avoid everything that might disqualify them for God’s service.[18]
The command not to mourn also applied because the crime of Nadab and Abihu was so provoking to God and fully merited the punishment which God had inflicted. To mourn in this case could be seen by the people as accusing God of undue severity.[19] Both the people and the priests needed to show submission to a righteous judgement.[20] If the anointed priests were to sin in this manner, the blame would fall not only upon them but also upon the people.[21]
However, the people in the community as a whole were allowed to mourn and display grief. The death of Nadab and Abihu was tragic yet deserved,[22] and the people were to first recognize that it was deserved and then mourn their death.
[edit] Catholic viewWhether Nadab and Abihu neglected to follow God’s outlined sacrificial system out of presumptuousness, or out of thoughtlessness and inattention, their fault was severely punished so that all might learn to comply exactly with God's commands, and not try to change them or explain them away.[23] The mixing of falsehood with the word of God was a serious sin. Those in power, like priests, should be especially careful in their behavior, because they are examples to those they serve.[24]
[edit] Reformation and Post Reformation viewNadab and Abihu were in a great position to become honorable and respected priests. If Nadab and Abihu’s deed had been done through ignorance, they may have been allowed to bring a sin-offering. But instead they did it presumptuously, and in contempt of God's majesty and justice. They were therefore cut off, for the wages of sin is death. The sin and punishment of these priests showed the imperfection of that priesthood from the very beginning, and that it could not shelter any from the fire of God's wrath.[25]
[edit] View in JudaismNadab and Abihu’s sin was an encroachment on duties which devolved on their father alone as the high priest. But the offense was of a far more aggravated nature than an encroachment on duties. There were multiple sins contained in one act. First, they ventured unauthorized to perform the incense service—the highest and most solemn of the priestly duties. They also engaged together in a work which was the duty only of one. And, thirdly, they presumed to light the fire on the offering themselves. In this respect, "they offered strange fire before the Lord"; they were guilty of a presumptuous and unwarranted intrusion into a sacred office which did not belong to them.[26] In these actions they showed carelessness, irreverence, and a want of faith, lamentable especially for those in the priestly service.[27] A precedent of such evil tendency was dangerous, and it was imperatively necessary, therefore, as well for the priests themselves as well as for the sacred things, that God should give a punishment.[28]
In the Book of Exodus, the Book of Leviticus and the Book of Numbers, Nadab "He (Yahweh) is my father") were respectively the eldest and second-eldest of the sons of Aaron.[1] They offered a sacrifice with unauthorized fire before the LORD, disobeying his instructions. Nadab and Abihu were consumed immediately by God’s fire. They trespassed upon a task that belonged only between God and the high priest. The priests were commanded not to mourn, but the people at large were permitted.
1525 BCE
1490 BCE~35
Death
26 May 1490 BCE
Abihu died on 26 May 1490 BCE, at age ~35, And Nadab and Abihu, the asons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered bstrange fire before the Lord, which he commanded them not.
2And there went out afire from the Lord, and bdevoured them, and they cdied before the Lord.
Last Edited | 26 October 2011 06:56:15 |
Citations
- [S187] Bible, Leviticus 10:1-2
PedigreeIthamar
M, #12527, b. 1515 BCE
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 29 October 2011 10:00:18 |
PedigreeNahshon of Judah
M, #12528, b. 1530 BCE
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 30 October 2011 14:48:18 |
PedigreeSalmon of Judah
U, #12529, b. 1500 BCE
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 30 October 2011 14:52:02 |
PedigreeEberhard van Hamaland1,2
M, #12530, b. estimated 850, d. about 898
Parents
Events
Title
Eberhard van Hamaland held the title Count in the Nordgau.
Title
He held the title Count in the Hamelant.
850
898~48
Death
About 898
He died about 898, at age ~48, murdered by Waltger Damien.
Last Edited | 17 September 2022 05:49:48 |
Citations
- [S68] Wikipedia
- [S979] Our Royal, Titled, Noble and Commoner Ancestors
PedigreeAdelinde1,2
F, #12531, b. estimated 853
Events
Last Edited | 17 September 2022 05:49:51 |
Citations
- [S68] Wikipedia
- [S979] Our Royal, Titled, Noble and Commoner Ancestors
PedigreeGerberge van Friesland1
F, #12532, b. 878
Parents
Events
878
Birth
878 | Vermandois, Aisne, Picardie, France
Last Edited | 16 September 2022 06:17:00 |
Citations
- [S487] The Peerage.com
PedigreeMaaseiah
M, #12533, b. 720 BCE
Parents
Father | Ahaz (b. 742 BCE, d. 716 BCE) |
Mother | Abijah (b. 740 BCE) |
Events
Last Edited | 29 October 2011 10:55:24 |
PedigreeJustin II of Byzantium
M, #12534, b. 520, d. 578
Parents
Father | Justinian I (b. 11 May 483, d. 14 November 565) |
Mother | Theodora (b. about 497, d. 28 June 548) |
Events
Last Edited | 12 October 2011 07:36:40 |
PedigreeJohannes
M, #12535, b. estimated 527
Parents
Father | Justinian I (b. 11 May 483, d. 14 November 565) |
Mother | Theodora (b. about 497, d. 28 June 548) |
Events
Last Edited | 29 October 2011 10:03:18 |
PedigreeSamuel Tenney
M, #12536, b. 21 August 1692
Parents
Events
1692
Birth
21 August 1692 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
Last Edited | 4 June 2020 16:14:21 |
Citations
- [S291] Vital Records of Rowley, MA to the end of year 1849
PedigreeThomas Mighill1
M, #12537, b. 29 October 1639, d. 1689
Parents
Events
1639
Birth
29 October 1639 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
166930
8 November 1669 | Roxbury, Suffolk, MA, US
Age: ~29
Birth: estimated 1640
1689~50
Death
1689 | Scituate, Plymouth, MA, US
1689
Last Edited | 15 May 2024 05:37:42 |
Citations
- [S122] Libby Davis Noyes, Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and NH
- [S291] Vital Records of Rowley, MA to the end of year 1849
PedigreeAnn Parrat
F, #12538, b. estimated 1608, d. 17 November 1694
Events
1608
1641~33
1641 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
Age: ~51
Birth: 1590 | York, Yorkshire, England
Death: 14 May 1655 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
1694~86
Death
17 November 1694 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
Last Edited | 13 April 2012 08:44:33 |
PedigreeSamuel Mighill
M, #12539, b. estimated 1625
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 30 October 2011 15:26:04 |
PedigreeEzekiell Mighill
M, #12540, b. estimated 1642
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 30 October 2011 15:26:10 |
PedigreeNathaniel Mighill
M, #12541, b. estimated 1644
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 30 October 2011 15:26:13 |
PedigreeStephen Mighill
M, #12542, b. estimated 1646
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 30 October 2011 15:26:15 |
PedigreeMary Mighill
F, #12543, b. estimated 1648
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 30 October 2011 15:26:18 |
PedigreeAnn Mighill
F, #12544, b. estimated 1650
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 30 October 2011 15:26:21 |
PedigreeFrancis Parrott1,2
M, #12546, b. 1610
Family:
Daughter | Faith Parrot+ (b. calculated 1641, d. 15 October 1715) |
Events
Last Edited | 29 April 2025 07:41:53 |
Citations
- [S835] A Genealogical History of the Clark and Worth familes and other Puritan Settlers in the Massachusetts Bay Colony
- [S1466] James Savage, A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England, Vol 2
PedigreeRaoul I Crespy
M, #12550, b. 972
Parents
Events
Last Edited | 22 July 2011 22:13:54 |