Phyllis Ann Boutwell and Eric Gordon Dearborn

Person Page 502

Pedigree

Abihu

M, #12526, b. 1525 BCE, d. 26 May 1490 BCE

Parents

FatherAaron of Judah (b. 1540 BCE)
MotherElisheba of Judah (b. 1535 BCE)

Events

  • Note
    Nadab and Abihu were the first two sons of Aaron the Levite by his marriage to Elisheba. He had four sons in total, the younger two sons being named Eleazar and Ithamar. According to the book of Exodus, Aaron and his sons were the first priests appointed as the priestly system was established by God.[2] The Levites as a tribe were later ordained for the priestly service after answering a call to take the LORD’s side after the idolatry centered around the golden calf.[3] After the death of Nadab and Abihu, Eleazar and Ithamar took their places as priests, because neither Nadab nor Abihu had any sons.[4]

    [edit] Violation of God’s law and punishmentIn Leviticus 9 and Exodus 30, God outlines a proper sacrifice to him.[5] Aaron, the chief priest, was to present all offerings representing himself and the people.

    Moses said to Aaron, “Come to the altar and sacrifice your sin offering and your burnt offering and make atonement for yourself and the people; sacrifice the offering that is for the people and make atonement for them, as the LORD has commanded.”

    — Leviticus 9:7 New International Version

    God would send his own fire to consume the sacrifice as a sign of his presence.[6]

    When Nadab and Abihu lit the offering in the censers themselves, the fire was unauthorized and God was not in it.[7] They prepared an incense offering upon kindling of their own. No offering of incense had been ordered; the only legitimate incense offerings were those made daily by the high priest upon the sacred altar.[8] Aaron’s sons neglected the command to wait for holy fire and offered incense with unauthorized fire.[9] Anyone who altered the sacrificial system assumed a prerogative belonging to God alone.[10] God determines the judgments that are carried out against those who either add to or take away from the declarations of God.[11]

    [edit] Burial and mourning[edit] BurialAfter the death of Nadab and Abihu, Moses dictated what was to be done with their bodies. He told Mishael and Elzaphan, the sons of Aaron’s uncle, to carry the bodies away from the sanctuary to a place outside of the camp. He specified for Mishael and Elzaphan to be careful to only touch Nadab and Abihu’s tunics, and not their bodies.[12] The first concerns in burial were to prevent what is holy from being defiled and the service of God from being disrupted.[13] The corpses had to be removed immediately, because to allow the uncleanliness of the bodies to remain in the sanctuary could invoke God’s wrath again.[14] The bodies were lifted up “by their tunics”[15] to avoid direct physical contact, preventing the carriers from becoming unclean as well.[16]

    [edit] MourningAaron and the other surviving priests are commanded not to mourn, participate in mourning rituals, or have contact with the dead. This was applicable not only in this case, but it was an ongoing command; these things are were generally forbidden to priests.[17] Priests were to avoid everything that might disqualify them for God’s service.[18]

    The command not to mourn also applied because the crime of Nadab and Abihu was so provoking to God and fully merited the punishment which God had inflicted. To mourn in this case could be seen by the people as accusing God of undue severity.[19] Both the people and the priests needed to show submission to a righteous judgement.[20] If the anointed priests were to sin in this manner, the blame would fall not only upon them but also upon the people.[21]

    However, the people in the community as a whole were allowed to mourn and display grief. The death of Nadab and Abihu was tragic yet deserved,[22] and the people were to first recognize that it was deserved and then mourn their death.

    [edit] Catholic viewWhether Nadab and Abihu neglected to follow God’s outlined sacrificial system out of presumptuousness, or out of thoughtlessness and inattention, their fault was severely punished so that all might learn to comply exactly with God's commands, and not try to change them or explain them away.[23] The mixing of falsehood with the word of God was a serious sin. Those in power, like priests, should be especially careful in their behavior, because they are examples to those they serve.[24]

    [edit] Reformation and Post Reformation viewNadab and Abihu were in a great position to become honorable and respected priests. If Nadab and Abihu’s deed had been done through ignorance, they may have been allowed to bring a sin-offering. But instead they did it presumptuously, and in contempt of God's majesty and justice. They were therefore cut off, for the wages of sin is death. The sin and punishment of these priests showed the imperfection of that priesthood from the very beginning, and that it could not shelter any from the fire of God's wrath.[25]

    [edit] View in JudaismNadab and Abihu’s sin was an encroachment on duties which devolved on their father alone as the high priest. But the offense was of a far more aggravated nature than an encroachment on duties. There were multiple sins contained in one act. First, they ventured unauthorized to perform the incense service—the highest and most solemn of the priestly duties. They also engaged together in a work which was the duty only of one. And, thirdly, they presumed to light the fire on the offering themselves. In this respect, "they offered strange fire before the Lord"; they were guilty of a presumptuous and unwarranted intrusion into a sacred office which did not belong to them.[26] In these actions they showed carelessness, irreverence, and a want of faith, lamentable especially for those in the priestly service.[27] A precedent of such evil tendency was dangerous, and it was imperatively necessary, therefore, as well for the priests themselves as well as for the sacred things, that God should give a punishment.[28]

    In the Book of Exodus, the Book of Leviticus and the Book of Numbers, Nadab "He (Yahweh) is my father") were respectively the eldest and second-eldest of the sons of Aaron.[1] They offered a sacrifice with unauthorized fire before the LORD, disobeying his instructions. Nadab and Abihu were consumed immediately by God’s fire. They trespassed upon a task that belonged only between God and the high priest. The priests were commanded not to mourn, but the people at large were permitted.
  • 1525 BCE
    Birth
    1525 BCE
  • 1490 BCE~35
    Death
    26 May 1490 BCE
    Abihu died on 26 May 1490 BCE, at age ~35, And Nadab and Abihu, the asons of Aaron, took either of them his censer, and put fire therein, and put incense thereon, and offered bstrange fire before the Lord, which he commanded them not.

    2And there went out afire from the Lord, and bdevoured them, and they cdied before the Lord.
    Citation: 1
Last Edited26 October 2011 06:56:15

Citations

  1. [S187] Bible, Leviticus 10:1-2
Pedigree

Ithamar

M, #12527, b. 1515 BCE

Parents

FatherAaron of Judah (b. 1540 BCE)
MotherElisheba of Judah (b. 1535 BCE)

Events

  • 1515 BCE
    Birth
    1515 BCE
Last Edited29 October 2011 10:00:18
Pedigree

Nahshon of Judah

M, #12528, b. 1530 BCE

Parents

FatherAminadab of Judah (b. 1500 BCE)

Family:

ChildSalmon of Judah (b. 1500 BCE)

Events

  • 1530 BCE
    Birth
    1530 BCE
Last Edited30 October 2011 14:48:18
Pedigree

Salmon of Judah

U, #12529, b. 1500 BCE

Parents

FatherNahshon of Judah (b. 1530 BCE)

Events

  • 1500 BCE
    Birth
    1500 BCE
Last Edited30 October 2011 14:52:02
Pedigree

Eberhard van Hamaland1,2

M, #12530, b. estimated 850, d. about 898

Parents

FatherMeginhard II & van Hamaland (b. 810)
MotherEvesa & van Argengau (b. 812, d. after 881)

Family: Adelinde (b. estimated 853)

DaughterGerberge van Friesland (b. 878)
DaughterSwanehild of Hamaland (b. 883)

Events

  • Name Wichmann
    Citation: 2
  • Title
    Eberhard van Hamaland held the title Count in the Nordgau.
    Citation: 2
  • Title
    He held the title Count in the Hamelant.
    Citation: 2
  • 850
    Birth
    Estimated 850
  • 898~48
    Death
    About 898
    He died about 898, at age ~48, murdered by Waltger Damien.
    Citation: 2
Last Edited17 September 2022 05:49:48

Citations

  1. [S68] Wikipedia
  2. [S979] Our Royal, Titled, Noble and Commoner Ancestors
Pedigree

Adelinde1,2

F, #12531, b. estimated 853

Family: Eberhard van Hamaland (b. estimated 850, d. about 898)

DaughterGerberge van Friesland (b. 878)
DaughterSwanehild of Hamaland (b. 883)

Events

  • 853
    Birth
    Estimated 853
Last Edited17 September 2022 05:49:51

Citations

  1. [S68] Wikipedia
  2. [S979] Our Royal, Titled, Noble and Commoner Ancestors
Pedigree

Gerberge van Friesland1

F, #12532, b. 878

Parents

FatherEberhard van Hamaland (b. estimated 850, d. about 898)
MotherAdelinde (b. estimated 853)

Events

  • 878
    Birth
    878 | Vermandois, Aisne, Picardie, France
Last Edited16 September 2022 06:17:00

Citations

  1. [S487] The Peerage.com
Pedigree

Maaseiah

M, #12533, b. 720 BCE

Parents

FatherAhaz (b. 742 BCE, d. 716 BCE)
MotherAbijah (b. 740 BCE)

Events

  • 720 BCE
    Birth
    720 BCE
Last Edited29 October 2011 10:55:24
Pedigree

Justin II of Byzantium

M, #12534, b. 520, d. 578

Parents

FatherJustinian I (b. 11 May 483, d. 14 November 565)
MotherTheodora (b. about 497, d. 28 June 548)

Events

  • 520
    Birth
    520
  • 578~58
    Death
    578
Last Edited12 October 2011 07:36:40
Pedigree

Johannes

M, #12535, b. estimated 527

Parents

FatherJustinian I (b. 11 May 483, d. 14 November 565)
MotherTheodora (b. about 497, d. 28 June 548)

Events

  • 527
    Birth
    Estimated 527
Last Edited29 October 2011 10:03:18
Pedigree

Samuel Tenney

M, #12536, b. 21 August 1692

Parents

FatherThomas ++ Tenney (b. 16 July 1648, d. 7 August 1730)
MotherMargaret ++ Hidden (b. 28 July 1659, d. 7 August 1730)

Events

  • 1692
    Birth
    21 August 1692 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
    Citation: 1
Last Edited4 June 2020 16:14:21

Citations

  1. [S291] Vital Records of Rowley, MA to the end of year 1849
Pedigree

Thomas Mighill1

M, #12537, b. 29 October 1639, d. 1689

Parents

FatherThomas Mighill (b. 1590, d. 14 May 1655)
MotherEllen Rockerfoote (b. calculated 1595, d. 1640)

Family: Bethulia Weld (b. estimated 1640)

DaughterElizabeth Mighill (b. estimated 1670)
SonSamuel Mighill (b. estimated 1672)
DaughterMary Mighill (b. estimated 1674)
DaughterGrace Mighill (b. estimated 1676)

Events

  • 1639
    Birth
    29 October 1639 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
    Citations: 2,1
  • 166930
    Marriage | Bethulia Weld
    8 November 1669 | Roxbury, Suffolk, MA, US
    Age: ~29
    Birth: estimated 1640
    Citation: 1
  • 1689~50
    Death
    1689 | Scituate, Plymouth, MA, US
    Citation: 1
  • 1689
    Will
    26 July 1689
    Citation: 1
Last Edited15 May 2024 05:37:42

Citations

  1. [S122] Libby Davis Noyes, Genealogical Dictionary of Maine and NH
  2. [S291] Vital Records of Rowley, MA to the end of year 1849
Pedigree

Ann Parrat

F, #12538, b. estimated 1608, d. 17 November 1694

Family: Thomas Mighill (b. 1590, d. 14 May 1655)

SonEzekiell Mighill (b. estimated 1642)
SonNathaniel Mighill (b. estimated 1644)
SonStephen Mighill (b. estimated 1646)
DaughterMary Mighill (b. estimated 1648)
DaughterAnn Mighill (b. estimated 1650)

Events

  • 1608
    Birth
    Estimated 1608
  • 1641~33
    Marriage | Thomas Mighill
    1641 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
    Age: ~51
    Birth: 1590 | York, Yorkshire, England
    Death: 14 May 1655 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
  • 1694~86
    Death
    17 November 1694 | Rowley, Essex, MA, US
Last Edited13 April 2012 08:44:33
Pedigree

Samuel Mighill

M, #12539, b. estimated 1625

Parents

FatherThomas Mighill (b. 1590, d. 14 May 1655)
MotherEllen Rockerfoote (b. calculated 1595, d. 1640)

Events

  • 1625
    Birth
    Estimated 1625
Last Edited30 October 2011 15:26:04
Pedigree

Ezekiell Mighill

M, #12540, b. estimated 1642

Parents

FatherThomas Mighill (b. 1590, d. 14 May 1655)
MotherAnn Parrat (b. estimated 1608, d. 17 November 1694)

Events

  • 1642
    Birth
    Estimated 1642
Last Edited30 October 2011 15:26:10
Pedigree

Nathaniel Mighill

M, #12541, b. estimated 1644

Parents

FatherThomas Mighill (b. 1590, d. 14 May 1655)
MotherAnn Parrat (b. estimated 1608, d. 17 November 1694)

Events

  • 1644
    Birth
    Estimated 1644
Last Edited30 October 2011 15:26:13
Pedigree

Stephen Mighill

M, #12542, b. estimated 1646

Parents

FatherThomas Mighill (b. 1590, d. 14 May 1655)
MotherAnn Parrat (b. estimated 1608, d. 17 November 1694)

Events

  • 1646
    Birth
    Estimated 1646
Last Edited30 October 2011 15:26:15
Pedigree

Mary Mighill

F, #12543, b. estimated 1648

Parents

FatherThomas Mighill (b. 1590, d. 14 May 1655)
MotherAnn Parrat (b. estimated 1608, d. 17 November 1694)

Events

  • 1648
    Birth
    Estimated 1648
Last Edited30 October 2011 15:26:18
Pedigree

Ann Mighill

F, #12544, b. estimated 1650

Parents

FatherThomas Mighill (b. 1590, d. 14 May 1655)
MotherAnn Parrat (b. estimated 1608, d. 17 November 1694)

Events

  • 1650
    Birth
    Estimated 1650
Last Edited30 October 2011 15:26:21
Pedigree

Francis Parrott1,2

M, #12546, b. 1610

Family:

DaughterFaith Parrot+ (b. calculated 1641, d. 15 October 1715)

Events

  • 1610
    Birth
    1610
Last Edited29 April 2025 07:41:53

Citations

  1. [S835] A Genealogical History of the Clark and Worth familes and other Puritan Settlers in the Massachusetts Bay Colony
  2. [S1466] James Savage, A Genealogical Dictionary of the First Settlers of New England, Vol 2
Pedigree

Raoul I Crespy

M, #12550, b. 972

Parents

FatherWalter II & ("The White") (b. 944, d. between 1017 and 1024)
MotherAlix & of Senlis (b. 944, d. 1006)

Events

  • 972
    Birth
    972
Last Edited22 July 2011 22:13:54